1778
The War Record · MIL-20
Savannah, Georgia · December 29, 1778 and October 9, 1779

Savannah: Lost Twice

The British took Savannah in an afternoon. Ten months later, a combined French and American army tried to take it back and failed at a cost few battles of the war matched. Both accounts survive in the same chain of letters between Charleston and Washington's headquarters, including a letter Washington wrote about the second battle three weeks after it happened, in complete ignorance that it had already been lost.

Fought

Dec 29, 1778 · Oct 9, 1779

Commanders

Maj. Gen. Robert Howe · Lt. Col. Archibald Campbell · Maj. Gen. Benjamin Lincoln · Comte d'Estaing

Archive

Founders Online, National Archives

By late 1778, the war in the North had stalled, and the British shifted their focus south, betting that Georgia's smaller population and large Loyalist sympathies would make it an easier target than Boston or New York had been. They were right, at first. A force under Lieutenant Colonel Archibald Campbell took Savannah from Major General Robert Howe's badly outnumbered garrison in a single afternoon. Ten months later, Benjamin Lincoln and a French fleet under the Comte d'Estaing tried to take it back, and the attempt became one of the costliest defeats of the war. The full chain of letters reporting both battles to Washington survives at Founders Online.

01
December 29, 1778
A City Lost in an Afternoon.

Archibald Campbell landed roughly 3,000 British troops below Savannah on December 29, 1778. Robert Howe had perhaps 850 Continentals and militia to defend the city, and positioned them on the high ground in front of it. Campbell found a path through a swamp Howe had judged impassable and turned his flank, forcing a retreat that cost the Americans 453 men captured against just 26 British casualties. Howe wrote his own account of the defeat the very next day, from a camp four miles outside the city, and Benjamin Lincoln forwarded it to Washington within the week.

"

Yesterday about three o'clock in the afternoon we were attacked in great force by the enemy. I was induced to throw myself between them and the Town of Savannah, not only to preserve the Town till reinforcements came up, but to keep out of their possession, if possible, a considerable quantity of provision and other stores, the property of the United States, and which for want of boats it had been out of my power to have removed. The situation I chose was the most defensible I could find.

Maj. Gen. Robert Howe, account of the battle · December 30, 1778, enclosed in Lincoln to Washington · Founders Online, National ArchivesFounders Online → →

Lincoln's covering letter to Washington, written from Purrysburg on the Savannah River, also preserved a piece of British propaganda distributed in the city after its capture: a proclamation issued in Campbell's name promising Georgia's residents protection from what it called the "bloody persecutions" of their own Congress, and inviting them to "rescue their friend from oppression, themselves from slavery" by joining the king's forces.

The proclamation's language is worth sitting with: a British military occupation in a slaveholding colony, framing its own arrival as a rescue from "slavery," aimed at white colonists it hoped would rally to the Crown. Lincoln copied the full text into his report to Washington specifically so headquarters would know what message the British were putting in front of Georgia's population.
02
September to October 1779
The Attempt to Take It Back.

Ten months later, Admiral d'Estaing's fleet, fresh from capturing Grenada in the Caribbean, sailed unexpectedly for the Georgia coast in response to Lincoln's appeal. Lincoln wrote excitedly to Congress on September 5, 1779, the moment the French fleet appeared offshore.

"

I have the pleasure to congratulate Congress on the arrival of Count D'Estaing's Fleet off Savannah, but am sorry to inform them that his stay on this coast will be but short, and the aid we can afford him very inconsiderable.

Maj. Gen. Benjamin Lincoln to John Jay, President of Congress · September 5, 1779 · Founders Online, National ArchivesFounders Online → →

D'Estaing's haste, driven by his own concern for hurricane season and his ships' exposure on an open coast, shaped everything that followed. After a brief and ineffective bombardment of the city failed to force a surrender, he pushed for an immediate assault rather than a longer, more careful siege. Lincoln agreed. The attack went in before dawn on October 9, against British defenses that, thanks to information from American deserters, were fully prepared and waiting.

The Honest Record
The single largest unit in the assault force on October 9 was not American. The Chasseurs-Volontaires de Saint-Domingue, roughly 545 free men of color recruited from the French Caribbean colony that would later become Haiti, fought in the front lines and covered the allied retreat once the assault collapsed, absorbing some of the heaviest casualties of the day. A monument unveiled in Savannah's Franklin Square in 2007 names this regiment and commemorates its service. Among the volunteers, by tradition though without firm documentary proof, was a twelve-year-old drummer named Henri Christophe, who would go on to lead Haiti's own revolution and become its first king. The siege also cost the Continental Army its most celebrated cavalry commander: Casimir Pulaski, the Polish nobleman who had organized American light cavalry from the ground up, was mortally wounded leading a charge that day and died within the week.
03
A Letter Written in Ignorance
Washington Did Not Know Yet.

News traveled slowly enough that, more than two weeks after the failed assault, Washington was still writing to Lincoln as though the operation against Savannah was ongoing or recently successful. His October 26 letter, sent from his headquarters in the North, discusses routine training matters and contains no hint that the battle had already been lost on October 9.

Founders Online's editorial note on this letter records that Washington did not receive official notice of the defeat until November 10, when a letter from Congress president Samuel Huntington finally reached him, eleven days after he had written to Lincoln as if the campaign were still in progress. The pattern is the same one this archive's Quebec episode documents from four years earlier: distance and the speed of an eighteenth century courier meant commanders routinely wrote and acted on news that had already been overtaken by events.

D'Estaing returned to France soon after, having lost both the battle and much of the goodwill the alliance had built since 1778. Lincoln retreated to Charleston with what remained of his army. Savannah stayed in British hands until July 1782, and the defeat opened the door for the British campaign against Charleston itself the following spring, a siege this archive covers separately.

Go Deeper, Primary Sources
Confirmed documents · Institutional archives
Continue in the Archive
Free Download
Six Documents the Archive Almost Lost
Six primary source manuscripts that were overlooked, misdated, or nearly erased from the record. Verified against institutional archives. Free with your email, along with new episodes as they post.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time. PDF delivered instantly via Substack.
A Note from the Founder

If you learned something new or just enjoyed the content, please share it and follow along on X and Substack.

- Jeff, FounderThe Founders' Record