1783
The War Record · MIL-27
New York City · November 25, 1783

New York: The Last Argument

The British held New York for seven years and left it in a single afternoon. Before they did, Washington and the British commander argued face to face over thousands of formerly enslaved people the British intended to carry away as free subjects. The transcript of that argument survives at Founders Online.

Evacuated

November 25, 1783

Commanders

Gen. George Washington · Gen. Sir Guy Carleton

Archive

Founders Online, National Archives

New York had been Britain's principal stronghold in North America since 1776, and remained in British hands for the entire war after that first year, longer than any other American city. Article 7 of the Treaty of Paris required British forces to leave "without causing any Destruction, or carrying away any Negroes, or other Property of the American Inhabitants." Long before the final evacuation, it became clear that article would not be honored the way Washington believed it should be. The dispute that followed, conducted face to face at a meeting in Orange Town and in letters that followed, survives complete at Founders Online.

01
May 6, 1783
A Conference at Orange Town.

Washington and British commander Sir Guy Carleton met in person that May to work out the practical terms of the coming evacuation. Washington raised the treaty's promise directly, and the minutes of the conversation, kept and preserved as an official record, capture both men's positions in close to their own words.

"

General Washington thereupon expressed his Surprize that after what appeared to him an express Stipulation to the Contrary in the Treaty. He principally insisted that he conceived it could not have been the Intention of the British Government by the Treaty of Peace to reduce themselves to the Necessity of violating their Faith to the Negroes who came into the British Lines under the Proclamation of his Predecessors in Command, that delivering up the Negroes to their former Masters would be delivering them up some possibly to Execution and others to severe Punishment, which in his Opinion would be a dishonorable Violation.

Account of a Conference between Washington and Sir Guy Carleton at Orange Town · May 6, 1783 · Founders Online, National ArchivesFounders Online → →

Carleton did not deny what was happening. He offered a different justification for it entirely, one built on a narrower reading of the treaty's wording and a practical argument about what would happen if he tried to stop it.

"

Sir Guy Carleton then observed that he was by the treaty held to any Property but was only restricted from carrying it away. If the Negroes were left to themselves without Care or Control from him, Numbers of them would very probably go off and not return to the parts of the Country they came from, or clandestinely get on board the Transports in Manner which it would not be in his Power to prevent, in either of which Cases an inevitable Loss would ensue to the Proprietors, but as the Business was now conducted they had at least a Chance for Compensation.

Account of a Conference between Washington and Sir Guy Carleton at Orange Town · May 6, 1783 · Founders Online, National ArchivesFounders Online → →
02
May 12, 1783
The Book of Negroes.

Carleton followed up in writing days later, explaining the record-keeping system his officers had put in place: a formal registry, recording each departing person's name, age, description, former enslaver, and claimed status, compiled specifically so that any dispute over compensation could be settled afterward rather than blocking anyone's departure in the moment. That registry became known to history as the Book of Negroes.

"

The Negroes in question, I have already said, I found free when I arrived at New York. I had therefore no right, as I thought, to prevent their going to any part of the world they thought proper. I must confess that the mere supposition, that the King's Minister could deliberately stipulate in a treaty an engagement to be guilty of a notorious breach of the public faith towards people of any complection, seems to denote a less friendly disposition than I had reason to expect.

Gen. Sir Guy Carleton to George Washington · May 12, 1783 · Founders Online, National ArchivesFounders Online → →
The registry Carleton described eventually recorded roughly 3,000 Black men, women, and children evacuated from New York, most bound for Nova Scotia, with each entry listing their name, age, physical description, the name of the enslaver they were claimed to belong to, and a brief note on the circumstances of their freedom. Washington's own three-man commission of embarkation, appointed to inspect the departing ships, reported to him afterward how limited their actual authority over the process had been. Washington himself, writing to Congress that June, questioned privately whether continuing the commission served any real purpose at all.
The Honest Record
Washington was arguing, in effect, to compel formerly enslaved people back into bondage, framed in his own words as delivering on a treaty obligation. Carleton, whose army had made the wartime promise of freedom in the first place, was the one insisting it be honored, though his own letters make clear his position was as much practical as principled: an evacuation full of people trying to escape re-enslavement by any means available was, in his telling, harder to control than one conducted through an open registry. Roughly 3,000 people secured their freedom through this process despite Washington's objection, a rare instance in the founding era where a formal British colonial commitment to enslaved people held up against an American commander's direct demand that it be broken.
03
November 19-25, 1783
The Final Days.

By mid-November, Carleton was working out the last logistics of departure, requesting continued use of the city's shipyard and a Long Island brewery and bakehouse for his remaining sick and wounded until the last transports could sail. His November 19 letter also passed along an unsettling intelligence report: an informant had warned that a group intended to plunder the city and attack remaining Loyalists the moment British troops withdrew, a fear serious enough that Carleton recommended the suspect be turned over to Washington's forces directly upon their entry into the city.

Carleton withdrew his forces to Staten Island on November 25, 1783, completing the evacuation of New York City. The last British transports and warships put to sea a little over a week later, on December 4, marking the final physical departure of British military power from the United States.

Go Deeper, Primary Sources
Confirmed documents · Institutional archives
Continue in the Archive
Free Download
Six Documents the Archive Almost Lost
Six primary source manuscripts that were overlooked, misdated, or nearly erased from the record. Verified against institutional archives. Free with your email, along with new episodes as they post.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time. PDF delivered instantly via Substack.
A Note from the Founder

If you learned something new or just enjoyed the content, please share it and follow along on X and Substack.

- Jeff, FounderThe Founders' Record